CRYOLIFE, INC. PHOTOFIX UNKNOWN CONFIGURATION; PATCH, PLEDGET AND INTRACARDIAC, PETP, PTFE, POLYPROPYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Multiple attempts have been made to gain further information to no avail.No product information could be obtained; therefor, a manufacturer's review could not be completed.The available information has been reviewed and a definitive root cause is unknown.Although a root cause could not be identified, the report has been documented for trending purposes.Should any additional information be received the investigation will be reopened and additional reports will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to an email on (b)(6) 2018: "this was reported verbally today (b)(6) 2018) from the surgeon.Both cases happened in the previous 2 weeks, but had the same issue.Serial number was not recorded or passed on, but i will attempt to track it down in the next few days.[surgeon] reported that he had two patches 'tear' at the suture hole and that both cases happened the same way.Both patches were used in a femoral endartectomy where the surgeon had a calcified native femoral artery with lots of plaque present.He sutured normally using a 6.0 prolene and on the proximal segment, where the vessel was calcified, he bit into the patch, then through the calcified tissue and pulled tight.When he pulled the suture tight, the suture cut through the patch elongating the suture hole.It happened on 2-3 bites on the proximal end.This created large needle holes and bleeding.{surgeon] used remaining patch material to 'buttress' or 'pledgett' these needle holes to stop the bleeding.He reported that his bites were normally space and about 2 mm into the patch.He did not remove the original patch material and used remaining patch material to reinforce the suture line.It added approximately 20-25 minutes to each case.He also reported that when he pulled the suture tight, that it felt like it was getting snagged on plaque.He additionally commented that he had done nothing different than when he used the [competitor's] patch material and had never experienced this before.His last was concern was the potential of a pseudoaneurysm forming at the suture site." multiple attempts have been made to gather more information to no avail.A report has been sent for each reported event.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to an email on(b)(6) 2018, "this was reported verbally today (b)(6) 2018, from the surgeon.Both cases happened in the previous 2 weeks, but had the same issue.Serial number was not recorded or passed on, but i will attempt to track it down in the next few days.[surgeon] reported that he had two patches 'tear' at the suture hole and that both cases happened the same way.Both patches were used in a femoral endartectomy where the surgeon had a calcified native femoral artery with lots of plaque present.He sutured normally using a 6.0 prolene and on the proximal segment, where the vessel was calcified, he bit into the patch, then through the calcified tissue and pulled tight.When he pulled the suture tight, the suture cut through the patch elongating the suture hole.It happened on 2-3 bites on the proximal end.This created large needle holes and bleeding.{surgeon] used remaining patch material to 'buttress' or 'pledgett' these needle holes to stop the bleeding.He reported that his bites were normally space and about 2 mm into the patch.He did not remove the original patch material and used remaining patch material to reinforce the suture line.It added approximately 20-25 minutes to each case.He also reported that when he pulled the suture tight, that it felt like it was getting snagged on plaque.He additionally commented that he had done nothing different than when he used the [competitor's] patch material and had never experienced this before.His last was concern was the potential of a pseudoanureysm forming at the suture site." multiple attempts have been made to gather more information to no avail.A report has been sent for each reported event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Multiple attempts have been made to gain further information to no avail.No product information could be obtained; therefor, a manufacturer's review could not be completed.The available information has been reviewed and a definitive root cause is unknown.Although a root cause could not be identified, the report has been documented for trending purposes.The risk has been evaluated and each individual hazard is mitigated and reduced as low as possible by design and process.Post production residual risk is communicated in the product's labeling and ifu (instructions for use).Should any additional information be received the investigation will be reopened and additional reports will be sent.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|