The reported event of nail breakage could be confirmed.According to available information the gamma3 nail had broken after an implantation period of approx.8 months.One requirement for successful nail treatment is a timely bone healing in order to relieve the nail over the progressing time of implantation.Potential adverse effects, e.G.Overweight, increased loading or material damage are clearly pointed out in the labeling.In this case the item broke in a fatigue manner after an implantation period of approximately 8 months.From technical point of view the lateral edge of the anterior web had been damaged intra operatively by deviation of the step drill ¿ causing chamfer like material removal.This damage had weekend the material in such a way that tensile stresses had initiated an incipient crack.During usual load bearing the crack had progressed towards medial and separated finally in a residual fracture.A medical assessment was not possible due missing medical records.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any conspicuity.The review of the risk assessment for the failure mode indicated nail breakage was addressed adequately.There were no actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product.No nonconformity was identified.Intra-operative damage, also pointed out in the labeling, was regarded being user related.Further, it could not be determined whether bone healing was sufficient after 6 months or more.With available information the event was not linked to a deficiency of the device.In case further information should become available, we reserve the right to update the investigation and change the root cause.
|