|
Upon receipt, the device interrogation revealed the eos battery status, detected on (b)(6) 2018.The device was implanted for 47 months and 17 charging cycles were recorded in the devices memory.The current consumption of the icd was analyzed and found to be normal and as expected.However, an inconsistency between current consumption and battery voltage was noted.Therefore, the icd was opened and the inner assembly was inspected.The visual inspection of the inner assembly showed no anomalies.The measurement of the battery voltage confirmed a depleted battery.In a next step, the electronic module was attached to an external power supply and the eos status was removed with a technical programmer to check the functionality of the electronic module.There was no indication of a malfunction, particularly all therapy functions were available and worked as expected.The battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process, associated with this battery.The battery was subjected to a visual and an electrical inspection as well as a microcalorimetry analysis.The visual inspection of the battery did not reveal any external signs of damage.The measurement of the battery voltage confirmed a depleted battery and the microcalorimetry analysis showed an elevated heat dissipation.In a next step, the battery was opened for destructive analysis.The inspection of the inner assembly identified damaged insulation, which led to the elevated internal self-depletion.In conclusion, the device was implanted for 47 months.The therapeutic functionality of the device was tested with an attached external power supply and proved to be fully functional.The analysis revealed an increased internal self-depletion within the battery that contributed to the clinical observation.
|