| Catalog Number |
03.100.025 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
10/07/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.A review of the device history records has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a pelvic reduction forcep broke in the middle of the case on (b)(6) 2018.There is no patient consequence.It was unknown if there is a surgical delay.Procedure outcome is unknown.This complaint involves one (1) device.This report is 1 of 1 for pc-(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device history: lot part number: 03.100.025, synthes lot number: a7qa47 (wo# 918456), release to warehouse date: 28-nov-2007, manufacture site: (b)(4), part expiration date: n/a, list of non-conformance¿s: n/a.A review of the device history records showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device and it's sub components that would contribute to the complaint condition.Traceability to the raw material lot number could not be established during this dhr review.No ncrs were generated during the production of this device.Device history batch null, device history review, review of the device history record of tuttlingen showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device that would contribute to the issue outlined in this complaint investigation summary: product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Updated event description.Additional hospital contact phone: (b)(6).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
11/23/2018:updated event description: it was reported that a pelvic reduction forceps broke in the middle of the case on (b)(6) 2018.There is no patient consequence.Surgery was completed successfully.There was no surgical delay reported.Fragments were generated from broken device.Removed broken or damaged devices or fragments easily with no other medical intervention required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Date of report ,date rec'd by mfr : these dates were inadvertently reported as 11/5/2018.The correct date for these fields is 10/07/2018.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|