• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS CL; MONOFOCAL IOLS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC. TECNIS CL; MONOFOCAL IOLS Back to Search Results
Model Number Z9002
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Date of Event 10/29/2018
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens was damaged while inserting the lens into the patient's operative eye.Reportedly, the haptic was bent.There was patient involvement; however, no patient injury reported.Patient was discharged stable.No further information provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation: yes.Returned to manufacturer on: 11/29/2018.Device returned to manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection to the returned lens using microscope magnification was performed.One lens haptic (loop) was observed distorted (d/l).The other haptic(loop) was observed in good conditions.There is no issue with the other lens haptic.Some particles and viscoelastic residues were observed.The reported issue as haptic damaged was verified.However, there is no evidence to suggest that the complaint sample has been affected by the manufacturing process.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa-010215.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS CL
Common Device Name
MONOFOCAL IOLS
Manufacturer (Section D)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
santa ana CA
MDR Report Key8103552
Report Number2648035-2018-01514
Device Sequence Number16543726
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474530683
UDI-Public(01)05050474530683(17)220208
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P880081
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source health professional,user faci
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/05/2020
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/08/2022
Device Model NumberZ9002
Device Catalogue NumberZ900200195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/29/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/29/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/12/2018
10/25/2020
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/26/2018
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/14/2018
11/05/2020
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-