| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device will not be returned for analysis as it remains implanted; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.Surgical report was received and will be reviewed as part of ongoing investigation.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.As soon as supplemental information becomes available an updated report will be submitted.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient has been noted to have leg length discrepancy due to incorrect implant size.The patient is experiencing pain, attempts to obtain additional information have been made; however, no more is available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Please refer to report 0009613350-2018-01180.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being filled to relay investigation result.Additional and corrected information are filled in the following fields: dhr review: the device manufacturing quality records indicate that the released components met all requirements to perform as intended.Trend analysis: no trigger considering the following event is identified: pain / use of wrong size implant event description: it was reported that the patient underwent right tep on nov 10, 2014 and is experiencing pain and a discrepancy with his leg lengths (right leg is shorter).He has been to two different surgeons - dr.Gerald j jerry jr.And dr.Harry greene (from oakland orthopedics) - who told him that his implant is the wrong size, namely too short and not wide enough.This causes pinching of the nerves in the soft tissue.A revision is planned.Review of received data: no medical data such as x-rays, surgical notes or any other case-relevant documents received.Device analysis: no product was returned to zimmer biomet for in-depth analysis.Review of product documentation: this device is intended for treatment -the compatibility check was performed and showed that the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Surgical technique is not reviewed as no surgical reports were received to compare.Conclusion: the investigation results did not identify a non-conformance or a complaint out of box (coob).Operative notes were not provided; it is unknown whether the components were implanted with the correct fit and orientation as per the surgical technique.No x-rays were received to confirm that the surgeon made a wrong size selection for the head.The quality records show that all specified characteristics (material, dimensions, surface, etc.) have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Based on the given information the complaint could not be confirmed.An exact root cause could not be determined.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|