|
Additional information received: it was reported that the vessels were not overly tortuous.It was reported during the index procedure, that pacing was not used and prior to deployment, the mean arterial pressure was lowered while the physician held forward pressure.It was reported that the physician could not reach the outer curve, it was noted that each time this was attempted, the whole delivery system moved forward.It was also reported that the physician was not expecting the device to shorten approximately 20-30mm and miss the desired landing zone.It was reported that the desired distal location had been planned via ct, 3d and angiogram scanning during the case.Film evaluation summary: the exact cause of the reported inaccurate distal placement of the device could not be determined from the pre-implant films provided.Images during implant were not provided and the reported event could not be assessed, and the post-implant ct¿s were also not available.Returned pre-implant ct¿s revealed that the patient had been implanted with a non-mdt (gore) stent graft.The 140mm length stent graft was positioned proximally just caudal to the lsa, and was essentially straight as it coursed distally.No appreciable thrombus was observed within the device, and the od along the distal portion of the stent graft measured 29mm (~25mm id).Just beyond the distal end of the stent graft the thoracic was acutely angulated ~100 deg anteriorly and 65 deg medially.Approximately 30mm distal from the stent graft and acute aortic angulation, a penetrating aortic ulcer (pau) of ~40mm diameter x 20mm length was visualized on the medial side of the thoracic.Intercostal arteries were noted in two locations near the proposed navion distal landing zone; one pair was 10mm distal to the pau and the 2nd pair was 43mm distal to the pau.The thoracic diameter along the distal landing zone ranged from 29 ¿ 27mm, and contained thrombus and mild calcification.Approximately 13cm distal to the pau, 5cm above the celiac, the thoracic was dissected.The entry tear was seen near a calcified section of the aorta, and the dissection continued to just above the distal aorta.It is possible that placement of the device across the acutely angulated thoracic, near the distal extent of the previously implanted gore stent graft, may have contributed to the inaccurate placement.It is unclear if possible stent graft interaction with the non-mdt device may have also been a factor.The cause of the inability to track along the outer thoracic curvature and the unexpected device shortening of 20-30mm, which may have also contributed to the inaccurate device placement, could not be determined from the films provided.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|