| Model Number |
204.832 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture (2369)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional product codes: hrs and jds.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018, due to a nonunion and hardware failure.Patient initially had an open reduction and internal fixation surgery on an (b)(6) 2018 to treat a left distal humerus fracture.The implanted devices were the following one (1) 2.7mm/3.5mm variable angle-locking compression plate (va-lcp) lateral distal humerus plate, one (1) 2.7mm/3.5mm variable angle-locking compression plate (va-lcp) medial distal humerus plate, nine (9) 2.7mm va locking screws, one (1) 2.7mm/3.5mm va-lcp proximal olecranon plate, and four (4) 3.5mm cortex screws.During the procedure, all hardware was removed and was intact.There was no complications or extended time needed.The fracture was reduced and an unknown variable angle elbow plate and unknown screws were used for fixation.The procedure was completed successfully and patient was stable.This report is for a 3.5mm cortex screw.Additional parts for this event are captured on related complaint (b)(4).This is report 4 of 6 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018, due to a nonunion and hardware failure.The patient initially had an open reduction and internal fixation surgery on (b)(6) 2018, to treat a left distal humerus fracture.The implanted devices were the following variable angle distal humerus, variable angle-lcp lateral distal humerus, eight (8) variable angle locking screw self-tapping with t8 stardrive, variable angle locking screw self-tapping with t8 stardrive, variable angle-lcp proximal olecranon, and four (4) cortex screw self- tapping.During the procedure, all hardware was removed and was intact.There was no complications or extended time needed.The fracture was reduced and an unknown variable angle elbow plates and unknown screws were used for fixation.The procedure was completed successfully and the patient was stable.There were no x-rays are available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Event date: exact date of event is unknown, reportedly the event occurred sometime in 2018.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was further reported that not all the devices were removed.It is unknown which specific devices were removed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: patient date of birth.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|