• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTECH SA ROSA BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGICAL DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTECH SA ROSA BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGICAL DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ROSA BRAIN 3.0
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage, Cerebral (1889)
Event Date 11/09/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been evaluated yet for investigation purpose.Once the evaluation is performed, a follow-up medwatch report will be submitted. (b)(4).
 
Event Description
While drilling the lain trajectory, the 2 surgeons noted a bit of blood along with csf drip from the anchor bolt.After drilling lpin trajectory, one of the surgeon also observed blood dripping with csf from the bolt and was concerned that a hemorrhage had occurred.The surgery was finished and the patient was taken to ct.The ct revealed a minor hemorrhage of the dural vasculature in lain.One of the surgeon opted for no surgical intervention and will continue to monitor the patient.This does not appear to be due to inaccuracy of the rosa and appears to be due to planning close to vessels in the dura.The surgeon explained that these vessels aren't as highly scrutinized as deep vessels when planning.The field service engineer spoke with the surgeon after the case, the bleed seemed to have been caused by drilling and not the obturator or electrode.
 
Event Description
While drilling the lain trajectory, the 2 surgeons noted a bit of blood along with csf drip from the anchor bolt.After drilling lpin trajectory, one of the surgeon also observed blood dripping with csf from the bolt and was concerned that a hemorrhage had occurred.The surgery was finished and the patient was taken to ct.The ct revealed a minor hemorrhage of the dural vasculature in lain.One of the surgeon opted for no surgical intervention and will continue to monitor the patient.This does not appear to be due to inaccuracy of the rosa and appears to be due to planning close to vessels in the dura.The surgeon explained that these vessels aren't as highly scrutinized as deep vessels when planning.The field service engineer spoke with the surgeon after the case, the bleed seemed to have been caused by drilling and not the obturator or electrode.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a dural hemorrhage was noticed during the surgery.A dhr review and a complaint history review were performed and did not identify any contributory factors to the event.A full analysis of data log indicates that the device worked as expected and that all trajectories were implanted with accuracy.The user explained that the hemorrhage was likely due to a planning close to vessels in the dura and that the drilling triggered the bleeding.It is the most probable root cause.No adverse events or serious injuries were reported regarding to the care of the patient.Unique identifier (udi) number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is provided to correct the udi number provided in section h10 of the initial report.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
While drilling the lain trajectory, the 2 surgeons noted a bit of blood along with csf drip from the anchor bolt.After drilling lpin trajectory,one of the surgeon also observed blood dripping with csf from the bolt and was concerned that a hemorrhage had occurred.The surgery was finished and the patient was taken to ct.The ct revealed a minor hemorrhage of the dural vasculature in lain.One of the surgeon opted for no surgical intervention and will continue to monitor the patient.This does not appear to be due to inaccuracy of the rosa and appears to be due to planning close to vessels in the dura.The surgeon explained that these vessels aren't as highly scrutinized as deep vessels when planning.The field service engineer spoke with the surgeon after the case, the bleed seemed to have been caused by drilling and not the obturator or electrode.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROSA BRAIN
Type of Device
COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGICAL DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTECH SA
zac eureka
900 rue du mas de verchant
montpellier, languedoc-roussillon 34000
FR  34000
MDR Report Key8136941
MDR Text Key129505642
Report Number3009185973-2018-00348
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K172444
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/27/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberROSA BRAIN 3.0
Device Catalogue NumberROSA BRAIN
Device Lot Number3.0.0.21
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/31/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-