|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent an unknown surgery for the proximal humerus with multiloc humeral nail.During the surgery, the surgeon could not attach the centering sleeve to the multiloc screw.The surgery was completed without a delay although it was not reported how the surgery was finished.There was no adverse consequence to the patient.This complaint involves four (4) devices.This report is 3 of 4 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part: 03.019.019, lot: 9643250, manufacturing site: haegendorf, release to warehouse date: 14.Oct.2015, the device history record shows this lot of (b)(4) pieces was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was conducted.The shipped device 03.019.019 centering sleeve 9.8*8.5 w coupling, f/multiloc is in proper condition.No special or heavily used look.The complaint description it is mentioned that the sleeve could not be attached to the screw.A dimensional inspection according to the valid inspection sheets at that time was carried out and has passed all the tests.Since the dimensional inspection found no issues, it is assumed that no production problems existed.The complaint condition is not confirmed.The review of the device history record revealed that this sleeve was manufactured according to the specifications.The parts conformed to dimensional specifications at the time of manufacturing and passed inspection requirements with no non-conformities reported.After completing the full investigation on the investigated device, it was determined that no evidence was found that suggests a potential defect.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed.Base on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventive action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|