• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1012451-12
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/29/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device was not returned for evaluation.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to anatomical conditions.It should be noted that the nc trek rx instructions for use states: do not use, or attempt to straighten, a catheter if the shaft has become bent or kinked; this may result in the shaft breaking.In this case, the resistance encountered caused the kink and separation.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a heavily calcified proximal left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery.A 3.5x12mm nc trek rx balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was advanced with resistance due to the heavy calcification in the entire lad.The physician stated that force was being placed on the bdc to attempt to cross the lesion, and therefore removed the bdc from the patient anatomy without reported issue.Upon removal, the distal shaft was noted to be bent; however, the physician reused the bdc for the procedure.The bdc was re-advanced in the patient anatomy and dilated the target lesion without issue.The balloon was then deflated, and the bdc was removed from the patient anatomy through the guiding catheter without issue; however, after the bdc was removed, the shaft snapped and separated where the bend was noted earlier in the procedure.Another trek bdc was used to further dilate the distal target lesion.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NC TREK CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CORONARY DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL COYOL, COSTA RICA REG# 3009031392
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key8165030
MDR Text Key130621806
Report Number2024168-2018-09701
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOX
UDI-Device Identifier08717648151972
UDI-Public08717648151972
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K110134
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/14/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Catalogue Number1012451-12
Device Lot Number80705G1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/03/2018
Initial Date FDA Received12/14/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
-
-