|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JOURN ART INS BCS STD 3-4 LT13; PROSTHESIS,KNEE,PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL,SEMICONSTRAINED,CEMENTED,POLY/METAL/POLY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74023244 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unstable (1667)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2011
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that patient was diagnosed with mid-flexion instability, left knee, status post total knee arthroplasty.A revision surgery was performed to exchange polyethylene component.A size 3, 18mm journey tibial component was implanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated complaint device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the complaint history revealed no prior complaints for the listed lot.A review of the manufacturing records for the listed batch did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.Our clinical/medical team concluded: : the root cause of the mid-flexion instability cannot be concluded; however, currently unable to rule out the patient¿s reported peripheral neuropathy/potentially weakened supporting soft tissues and/or possible deficient collateral ligaments as possible contributing factors to the reported event as the primary implants reportedly provided ¿excellent stability¿ and ¿appropriate laxity at 30 degrees flexion to varus and valgus stress¿ post-primary(b)(6) and was reportedly corrected during the revision with a thicker articular insert, which also did not reflect component mal-performance.The patient impact beyond the reported early post-primary mua, the mid-flexion instability, and the revision/thicker insert/exchange with an expected brief post-operative rehabilitation phase cannot be concluded.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.Without the actual product involved our investigation cannot proceed.If the device or new information is received in the future, this complaint can be re-opened.No further actions are being taken at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The associated complaint device was not returned.The clinical/medical task, based on the documentation provided, the root cause of the reported early onset of reduced rom was likely the well-known complication of arthrofibrosis which was released during the mua thus providing full rom post-procedure[(b)(4)] and did not suggests component failure.The root cause of the mid-flexion instability cannot be concluded; however, currently unable to rule out the patient¿s reported peripheral neuropathy/potentially weakened supporting soft tissues and/or possible deficient collateral ligaments as possible contributing factors to the reported event as the primary implants reportedly provided ¿excellent stability¿ and ¿appropriate laxity at 30 degrees flexion to varus and valgus stress¿ post-primary[c-216908] and was reportedly corrected during the revision with a thicker articular insert, which also did not reflect component mal-performance.The patient impact beyond the reported early post-primary mua, mid-flexion instability, and revision/thicker insert exchange with an expected brief post-op rehab cannot be concluded.A review of the production documentation for the corresponding products did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.A review of complaint history for the listed part revealed no prior complaints for the listed batch/failure mode.Without the actual device involved our investigation cannot proceed.If the device or new information is received in the future, the complaints can be re-opened.No further actions are being taken at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|