|
During the initial inflation of a maxi ld balloon catheter, it ruptured at four atmosphere (4atm).There was no patient injury.A second balloon was used to finish the angioplasty.The target lesions were the right common femoral vein, right external iliac vein, and right common iliac vein.The vessels were not calcified, tortuous and had fifty percent stenosis.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, the guide catheter, or through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter was never in an acute bend and was removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.There was no difficulty tracking towards the lesion.There was no difficulty inflating the balloon during prep, removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.A competitor's contrast media and inflation device were used.The contrast to saline ratio was forty/sixty.The inflation device was successfully used with other devices.One product was returned for analysis.A non-sterile maxi ld balloon catheter was received.Per visual analysis the balloon catheter was coiled inside a clear plastic bag.The device was received with the balloon deflated.No damages or anomalies were observed.Functional tests were performed, the guide wire lumen was flushed, and a lab sample guide wire was inserted through it.A stopcock (three-way valve) was attached to the inflation lumen port in order to apply negative pressure and purge the balloon of air.The inflator/deflator device was attached to the inflation lumen.The balloon inflation test was done by applying pressure with the inflator/deflator device.The balloon did not inflate as expected due to a leakage observed at the proximal section of the balloon.Per sem analysis a rupture on the external surface of the balloon was noted.The rupture presented evidence of bulged/peeled balloon material as well as micro tears, abrasions and scratch marks adjacent to the balloon rupture.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82159289 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon burst-at/below rbp¿ was not confirmed by analysis of the returned device due to the technical definition of a burst; however, the balloon did not inflate as expected due to a leakage observed at the proximal section of the balloon.Results per analysis showed that the balloon leakage was caused by a rupture on the balloon surface.The external surface of the balloon presented with a bulged/peeled balloon material as well as abrasions, micro tears and scratch marks adjacent to the rupture.This type of damage is commonly caused during the interaction of the balloon material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.Although, vessel characteristics may have contributed to the reported event as the presence of calcification is known to cause damage to balloons.According to the safety information in the instructions for use ¿note: the rated burst pressure is printed on the package label.In vitro testing has shown that with 95% confidence, 99.9% of the balloons will not burst at or below the rated pressure.Balloons should not be inflated in excess of the rated burst pressure.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
|
|
During the initial inflation of a maxi ld balloon catheter rupture at four atmosphere (atm).There was no patient injury.A second balloon had to be used to finish the angioplasty.The target lesions are the right common femoral vein, right external iliac vein, and right common iliac vein.The vessels were not calcified, tortuous and had fifty percent stenosis.There were no difficulty inflating the balloon during prep.There were no difficulties removing the product from the hoop, the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product the product into the patient.A competitor's contrast media and inflation device was used.The contrast to saline ratio was forty/sixty.The inflation device was successfully used with other devices.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve, the guide catheter, or through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion.The catheter has never been in an acute bend.The product removed intact (in one piece) from the patient.There was no difficulty tracking towards the lesion.The device is available for analysis.No other information was provided.
|