• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN (IRVINE) PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN (IRVINE) PIPELINE FLEX; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED-500-35
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 11/27/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis.Since the device was not returned, we are unable to perform further root cause analysis.All devices are 100% tested and all products are 100% inspected for damages and irregularities during manufacture.Per the device¿s instructions for use (ifu) ¿caution: the presence of other indwelling endovascular stents may interfere with proper deployment and function of the ped.¿ ¿use fluoroscopy to carefully monitor the tip of the core wire during ped deployment.¿ ¿ped fo reshortens substantially (50-60%) during deployment.Take device foreshortening into account when deploying ped.¿ if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received report that during the pipeline embolization procedure, there was a gap between the pipeline construction between the first and the second.At the time of deployment, pushing with the catheter was insufficient, the second pipeline did not deploy to 5 mm in diameter.While trying to use a competitor balloon to better achieve full wall apposition, the balloon allegedly did not pass through the second ped's bending section and pushed the pipeline which prevented the proximal part of the pipeline from being delivered.The proximal part of the ped which stuck in the proximal vessel of the aneurysm was pushed by the balloon and advanced into the aneurysm sac.The proximal part of the second pipeline did not move in the distal direction.The balloon was in the deployed pipeline which was bent in the aneurysm, the tip of the balloon got stuck at the net of the pipeline and did not advance.During this maneuver, the pipeline was alleged to have injured the internal carotid and a hemorrhage occurred.Per the procedure imaging, the bleeding was not inside of the aneurysm and within the proximal blood vessel or epidural, therefore another pipeline was implanted, the procedure ended.The patient was reported to be under observation for carotid-cavernous fistula (ccf).The surgical time was extended by more than 30 min.Vessel diameter was slightly large and was not tortuous.The devices were are prepared and used per the instructions for use.No images are available.
 
Event Description
Additional information received noted that inside the first pipeline at the proximal part, the second pipeline was overlapped and deployed.For the position of the second pipeline the distal part was in the first pipeline and overlapped, the central part was in the aneurysm, and the proximal part was in the proximal vessel of the aneurysm.The proximal part which stuck in the proximal vessel of the aneurysm was pushed by the scepter and advanced into the aneurysm.The scepter was in the deployed pipeline which was bent in the aneurysm, the tip of the scepter got stuck at the net of the pipeline and did not advance.At the time of deployment the pushing with the catheter was insufficient and the pipeline did not deploy to 5mm in diameter, with the diameter of the second pipeline smaller than that of the first and a gap of about 1mm between the first and second.Therefore, a balloon was used to expand the second pipeline from the inside.For the movement of the balloon it was noted that it advanced from the proximal vessel into the aneurysm.It was confirmed that the pipeline opened normally.The device were prepared as indicated per the ifu.It is unknown if a continuous flush was used.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN (IRVINE)
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
MDR Report Key8170122
MDR Text Key130529290
Report Number2029214-2018-01077
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
UDI-Device Identifier00847536016903
UDI-Public00847536016903
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100018.S011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/08/2021
Device Model NumberPED-500-35
Device Catalogue NumberPED-500-35
Device Lot NumberA642752
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2018
Initial Date FDA Received12/17/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/14/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/28/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-