| Catalog Number |
TEXP120RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
09/21/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) -year-old female patient underwent a breast reconstruction primary with artoura breast tissue expander 375cc and experienced deflation on the right breast tissue expander.As a result, the patient had undergone removal and replacement with artoura breast tissue expander 700cc on (b)(6) 2018.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 1/17/2019, it was reported to mentor that the device evaluation and investigation have been completed.Upon receipt by mentor, the device contained no fluid.No foreign material was observed within the device or on the shell surface.During visual examination, mentor product analysis lab observed a rent on the anterior view of the device measuring 2.1 cm in length.Microscopic examination of the rent edges gave no indications as to its cause.No other anomalies were found.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.Mentor product analysis lab concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.The complaint of deflation was confirmed since a rent was found on the device.Nonetheless, a microscopic examination of the rent edges was performed, and it did not provide conclusive evidence of what could be the root cause.Mentor products are 100% visually inspected prior to release in addition to thorough in-process testing during several stages of the manufacturing process.Mentor product analysis lab concluded that the rent occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.The severity level for this complaint code was determined to be a s3, which is defined as: necessitates intrusive medical or surgical intervention.No corrective action is required since there is no evidence that the failures modes are related with manufacturing or product design.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|