• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH 5.5 EXP VERSE FEN SCR 6.0X45; THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH 5.5 EXP VERSE FEN SCR 6.0X45; THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 199723645S
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 11/28/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
The following was reported, the screw was removed and a larger diameter (7x40) was inserted in its place.The l3 screw was present from a previous fusion: l2-s2ai with xlifs at l2/3, l3/4 & l4/5.The screw was removed and it became clear the tip of the screw had snapped due to the subsidence of the titanium cage above at the 2/3 disc space.In subsiding the cage had collided with the screw and broken it.This was highlighted to mr (b)(6) and as the broken fragment was some way into the vertebral body he opted to leave it in situ inserting a shorter screw with a wider diameter to avoid hitting the fragment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The screw was found to have broken at the base of the shank.Fracture analysis was subsequently performed on the screw.Optical imaging of the fracture site shows two surface morphologies, a smooth region and a rough region that are indicative of fatigue failure.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.The root cause of the screw breaking cannot be determined from the sample and the information provided.The results of fracture analysis have determined that a potential root cause may be fatigue failure.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
5.5 EXP VERSE FEN SCR 6.0X45
Type of Device
THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL CH
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INT SPINE
chemin blanc 38
le locle
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6103142063
MDR Report Key8173778
MDR Text Key130646431
Report Number1526439-2018-51152
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
UDI-Device Identifier10705034443515
UDI-Public(01)10705034443515
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K173095
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2021
Device Model Number199723645S
Device Catalogue Number199723645S
Device Lot NumberAVDCV3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/14/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/07/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-