• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOPHYSA POLARIS; POLARIS ADJUSTABLE PRESSURE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOPHYSA POLARIS; POLARIS ADJUSTABLE PRESSURE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number SPV
Device Problem Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate (1496)
Patient Problem Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 11/22/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A (b)(6) year-old female patient was implanted with a ventriculo-peritoneal derivation using a polaris valve in 2016.The valve was adjusted on its second operating pressure.She was followed-up on a very regular basis from the initial surgery to the first occurrence of the issue : on (b)(6) 2018 she presented with enlarged ventricles on a ct scan.The valve was found to be set on the highest operating pressure (which was confirmed by the adjustment tool and x-ray), explaining the typical hydrocephalus imaging seen on the ct.The valve was adjusted with the adjustment kit on its initial setting level but found to be too low on the confirmation x-ray.It was adjusted again, and the patient showed clinical improvement.She presented unwell 10 days later, adjustment kit and x-ray underlined that the valve was adjusted on its highest pressure setting.The valve was explanted and replaced.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to our manufacturing facility for quality analysis.Visual examination: the returned valve is clean and shows no particles or deposits that could have explained a possible pressure adjustment failure.The shuttles contained in the inner mechanism of the device appears to be unlock in the state of return.Functional controls: the ability of the valve to perform as intended was tested.Flushing air and alcohol through the inner mechanism remains possible and the mechanism is not stuck.Pressure adjustment remains possible in the state of return and after cleaning of the device.The shuttles of the rotor do not lock as they should after the adjustment operation is performed.The rotor position can easily be changed when the magnet of the adjustment kit is brought closer to the magnetic field of the valve.The adjustment issue faced by the user is confirmed by the quality analysis performed on the valve.Additional investigations are currently being performed on the valve in order to determine the root cause of the incident.Further information will be provided following these new analyses.
 
Event Description
A six-year-old female patient was implanted with a ventriculo-peritoneal derivation using a polaris valve in 2016.The valve was adjusted on its second operating pressure.She was followed-up on a very regular basis from the initial surgery to the first occurrence of the issue : on (b)(6) 2018 she presented with enlarged ventricles on a ct scan.The valve was found to be set on the highest operating pressure (which was confirmed by the adjustment tool and x-ray), explaining the typical hydrocephalus imaging seen on the ct.The valve was adjusted with the adjustment kit on its initial setting level but found to be too low on the confirmation x-ray.It was adjusted again, and the patient showed clinical improvement.She presented unwell 10 days later, adjustment kit and x-ray underlined that the valve was adjusted on its highest pressure setting.The valve was explanted and replaced.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARIS
Type of Device
POLARIS ADJUSTABLE PRESSURE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOPHYSA
5 rue guy moquet
orsay, 91400
FR  91400
MDR Report Key8179426
MDR Text Key131146998
Report Number3001587388-2018-18558
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K031097
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/07/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSPV
Device Catalogue NumberSPV
Device Lot NumberDO367
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/23/2018
Initial Date FDA Received12/19/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/23/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/07/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
-
-