• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Wound Dehiscence (1154); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article, therefore no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products used in this procedure? citation: j.Obstet.Gynaecol.2014; 40(2): 381¿386.Doi: 10.1111/jog.12207.
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: "title: emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes: a retrospective, comparative study" authors: shigeru aoki, emi ohnuma, kentaro kurasawa, mika okuda, tsuneo takahashi, fumiki hirahara.Citation: j.Obstet.Gynaecol.2014; 40(2): 381¿386.Doi: 10.1111/jog.12207.The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes after emergency cerclage versus expectant management for prolapsed fetal membranes in women with cervical incompetency.The january 2000¿december 2012 hospital database was analyzed to identify women managed for prolapsed fetal membranes who did not have premature rupture of membranes, clinically discernible chorioamnionitis, or treatment-resistant uterine contractions from 15 to 26 weeks of gestation retrospectively.A total of 15 of the 35 women (age range: 27 to 42 years old) underwent emergency cervical cerclage (¿cerclage group¿), while the other 20 patients (age range: 30 to 42 years old) were managed expectantly (¿bedrest group¿).During the surgical procedure in the cerclage group, mersilene tape (ethicon) was used.In the cerclage group, reported complications included premature rupture of membrane (n-3), detachment of mersilene tape from the cervical mucosa (n-2), and chorioamnionitis (n-8).The present results suggest that in women with prolapsed fetal membranes who do not have prom, treatment-resistant uterine contractions or clinical chorioamnionitis, emergency cervical cerclage achieves greater prolongation of pregnancy than expectant management.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key8181276
MDR Text Key131159363
Report Number2210968-2018-77907
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDC
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-