• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Bacterial Infection (1735)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article, therefore no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products (mersilene tape or vicryl suture) involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products (mersilene tape or vicryl suture) used in this procedure? citation: j.Obstet.Gynaecol.Res.2014; 40(7): 1853¿1861.Doi: 10.1111/jog.12435.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: "title: obstetric and neonatal outcomes of delayed interval delivery in cerclage and non-cerclage cases: an analysis of 20 multiple pregnancies".Authors: emek doger, yigit cakiroglu, yasin ceylan, emre kole, sebiha ozkan, eray caliskan.Citation: j.Obstet.Gynaecol.Res.2014; 40(7): 1853¿1861.Doi: 10.1111/jog.12435.The aim of the study was to compare maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies in which cerclage was placed following the loss of first fetus with those without cerclage placement in multiple pregnancies for delayed interval delivery.Records of pregnancies in which the first fetus was lost between 13¿26 weeks and delayed delivery experienced for retained fetus(es), were collected retrospectively.A total of 20 patients (age range: 20 to 40 years old) including 11 twins, seven triplets and two quadruplets were evaluated.Cases with cervical cerclage placed after the first delivery were evaluated as the cerclage group (11 patients) and the cases without cerclage placement were evaluated as the non-cerclage group (9 patients).In all cases who were suitable for the trial of delayed interval delivery and who had given informed consent, the placenta was left in situ after the first delivery.The umbilical cord of the first fetus was sutured with vicryl 0 (ethicon) and cut as high as possible at the cervical level.In the cerclage group, cerclage was performed by the placement of mersilene tape (ethicon) to the cervix in the directions, 12, 3, 6, and 9 o¿clock after gentle replacement of membrane which was prolapsed by wet sponges following irrigation of the vagina by povidone-iodine solution.In the cerclage group, reported complications included case 1, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, sepsis, and septic shock and was discharged in a healthy condition; case 3, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with post-partum bleeding which required blood transfusion; case 4, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; case 5, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis; case 7, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with chorioamnionitis; case 8, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; case 10, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; and case 11, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis.In the non-cerclage group, reported complications included case 12, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; case 13, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; case 15, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with chorioamnionitis; case 16, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with chorioamnionitis; case 17, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with preterm premature rupture of membranes; and case 20, a (b)(6) year-old female patient with chorioamnionitis.In conclusion, for the pregnancies remote from term, delay of the delivery of other fetuses that are retained after the birth of the first fetus may increase the survival chance of the newborn, and it is an alternative to the termination of pregnancy.A longer interval may be obtained by the implementation of cervical cerclage and this may contribute to the birthweight of the newborn.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MERSILENE TAPE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
INSTRUMENT, SURGICAL, DISPOSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key8190408
MDR Text Key131312306
Report Number2210968-2018-77976
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age21 YR
-
-