|
Continued from section occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report.A functional test could not be performed due to the condition of the returned device.A visual examination of the balloon showed a rupture along the length of the balloon material.A product-specific discrepancy that could have caused or contributed to this observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.It is unknown if the device received negative pressure and lubrication prior to advancement.A contributing factor to balloon rupture is failure to apply negative pressure and lubrication to the balloon prior to advancement through the endoscope.The instructions for use direct the user: "prior to insertion, negative pressure is mandatory to maintain balloon deflation." the application of negative pressure will aspirate all residual air from the balloon and ease endoscopic advancement.Negative pressure will also aid in balloon preservation and optimize balloon performance.The instructions for use direct the user: "apply a water soluble lubricant to balloon to allow easier passage through accessory channel." this activity will aid in endoscopic advancement and balloon preservation.Another possible contributing factor is using a compromised inflation device to inflate the balloon.If the pressure reading of the inflation device is inaccurate, this could contribute to over inflation, possibly resulting in damage to the balloon material.Prior to distribution, all quantum ttc colonic balloon dilators are subjected to a visual examination to ensure device integrity.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Corrective action: corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
During a dilation procedure, the physician used a cook quantum ttc colonic balloon dilator.The balloon exploded [ruptured] with the right pressure, and did not maintain dilation.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|