Catalog Number 111653 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 12/10/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
¿as part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.¿.
|
|
Event Description
|
Stryker rep reported that, prior to closing the patients incision, the greater trochanter checkpoint was removed (111653) followed by the pelvic checkpoint (111653) ¿ on inspection of the pelvic checkpoint it was noticed that the pin section was missing.An x-ray was carried out showing that the pin was remaining inside the patients bone.Mr conroy (surgeon) proceeded with surgical intervention to remove it.This caused a delay of around 30 minutes to the operative time.Unfortunately the checkpoint was discarded by mistake after requesting it was kept.The checkpoints that were used in this case were 2x 111653 3.5 hex impaction checkpoints with 1 failing.
|
|
Event Description
|
Stryker rep reported that, prior to closing the patients incision, the greater trochanter checkpoint was removed (111653) followed by the pelvic checkpoint (111653) ¿ on inspection of the pelvic checkpoint it was noticed that the pin section was missing.An x-ray was carried out showing that the pin was remaining inside the patients bone.Mr conroy (surgeon) proceeded with surgical intervention to remove it.This caused a delay of around 30 minutes to the operative time.Unfortunately the checkpoint was discarded by mistake after requesting it was kept.The checkpoints that were used in this case were 2x 111653 3.5 hex impaction checkpoints with 1 failing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: stryker rep reported that, prior to closing the patients incision, the greater trochanter checkpoint was removed (111653) followed by the pelvic checkpoint (111653) ¿ on inspection of the pelvic checkpoint it was noticed that the pin section was missing.An x-ray was carried out showing that the pin was remaining inside the patients bone.Mr conroy (surgeon) proceeded with surgical intervention to remove it.This caused a delay of around 30 minutes to the operative time.Tha unfortunately the checkpoint was discarded by mistake after requesting it was kept.The checkpoints that were used in this case were 2x 111653 3.5 hex impaction checkpoints with 1 failing.Product evaluation and results: device unavailable for inspection.Product history review: a review of the device history records could not be performed as the lot was not provided.Complaint history review: a review of the complaint history could not be performed as the lot was not provided.Conclusions: no further investigation for this event is possible at this time as no devices and / or insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If devices and / or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.Corrective action/preventive action: a review of stryker¿s nc/capa database indicated there have been no ncs or capas associated with the product and failure mode reported in this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|