• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. ENDOLOOP LIGATURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. ENDOLOOP LIGATURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT; CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Abscess (1690)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products used in this procedure? citation: surg laparosc endosc percutan tech 2013; 23: 255¿258.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: "a comparison of nonabsorbable polymeric clips and endoloop ligatures for the closure of the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized study." authors: elif colak, md, metin kement, md, nuraydin ozlem, md, tahir mutlu, md, kadir yildirim, md, ahmet gurer, md,w and recep aktimur, md.Citation: surg laparosc endosc percutan tech 2013; 23: 255¿258.The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of hem-o-lok ligation system in laparoscopic appendix stump closure by comparing the endoloop ligature.Between sep2010 and jul2011, 53 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and were randomized into two study groups: group hem-o-lok (n=26; n=13 male and n=12 female; age of 31.9±13.2 years) and group endoloop (n=27; n=15 male and n=12 female; age of 26.8±11.7 years) for appendicular stump closure.In group endoloop, the base of the appendix was ligated using 2 proximal and 1 distal endoloop ligatures.Postoperatively in endoloop group, only one patient developed periappendicular abscess and was treated successfully by interventional drainage.The most significant postoperative complication was periappendicular abscess which developed in a single patient from the endoloop group.But, it is impossible to say whether it was caused by continuing local peritonitis or by leakage of the stump since the patient had perforated appendicitis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOLOOP LIGATURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
CANNULA, SURGICAL, GENERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key8200514
MDR Text Key131544621
Report Number2210968-2018-78054
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
K925914
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/06/2018
Initial Date FDA Received12/27/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-