• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/06/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
¿as part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.¿.
 
Event Description
During bone prep, the saw blade checkpoint on the angled saw attachment passed.The femoral checkpoint passed as well.We then proceeded to make the distal and posterior chamfer cuts.When attempting to pass the saw blade checkpoint on the straight saw attachment the checkpoint error read 4.1mm.The blade assembly was checked, then the robot was registered again.The rest of the cuts were then completed.When dr.Wong placed the femoral trial on the bone he noticed the trial was not seated on the distal and posterior chamfer cuts.He used a ruler to measure the height of the gap which measured 4mm.Final results were good.No patient harm.
 
Event Description
During bone prep, the saw blade checkpoint on the angled saw attachment passed.The femoral checkpoint passed as well.We then proceeded to make the distal and posterior chamfer cuts.When attempting to pass the saw blade checkpoint on the straight saw attachment the checkpoint error read 4.1mm.The blade assembly was checked, then the robot was registered again.The rest of the cuts were then completed.When dr.Wong placed the femoral trial on the bone he noticed the trial was not seated on the distal and posterior chamfer cuts.He used a ruler to measure the height of the gap which measured 4mm.Final results were good.No patient harm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding inaccurate resection and poor trial fit during a total knee procedure involving 3.0 rio robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio 732 found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.Complaint history: based on the device identification (pn 209999) the complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding inaccurate resection and trial gaps.There were other reported events for the listed catalog number (b)(4).Conclusion: an analysis of the warnings in the crisis log file, application workflow, femur checkpoint values, femur registration values, rio registration and erification values, bone preparation checkpoint values and burr-list accuracy was completed.No system defect or malfunction is suspected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8202730
MDR Text Key131716279
Report Number3005985723-2018-00796
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/15/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/06/2018
Initial Date FDA Received12/28/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/30/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/15/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-