It was reported via journal article "title: management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor".Author(s): yaakov e.Abdelhak, rimma aronov, henry roque, and bruce k.Young citation: j.Perinat.Med.28 (2000) 4532457.This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the risks and benefits to patients who carry to term after undergoing a shirodkar cerclage where the cerclage is not removed until the patient presents in labor.Over a 25-year span, from 01jan1974 to 01oct1998, 82 pregnant female patients who underwent shirodkar cerclage were qualified for the review.In the procedure, a 5-mm mersilene band was placed submucosally from posterior to anterior at the level of the internal os and tied anteriorly.The band and knot were buried by closing the mucosal incisions with a running 00 chromic suture.Complications included cervical laceration (n=3) which were repaired easily, and cervical dystocia (n=1) treated with pitocin and the baby was delivered via c-section.Allowing patients to proceed to labor with a shirodkar cerclage in place, does not increase the risks of cervical dystocia, cervical laceration, or uterine rupture above the reported incidence for these complications in patients in whom the cerclage is removed prophylactically.
|