|
DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.0MM MULTIBLADE PLUS 5PK; ARTHROSCOPIC SHAVER SYSTEM BLADE, SINGLE-USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
283439 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
12/17/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that there were some problems with 4 mm multi blade plus.Affiliate stated that there were metal particulates in joint from tornado shaver.It was discovered during knee arthroscopy surgical procedure.All particulates were removed by changing the blade without any patient harm.There was a five minutes surgical delay.There was patient involvement reported.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Corrected data: the investigation summary has been correct to reflect the device return and evaluation.The complaint device was received and inspected.The complaint can be confirmed.A visual inspection was performed to determine if the device had any gross visual defects that may contribute to the complaint condition.It was observed that the surfaces of the inner blade and outer hub were scratched in the lateral direction.To test the functionality of the device, the inner blade was rotated in both directions.From this operation, no notable resistance was detected.Per the ifu, proper irrigation must be maintained while the device is in use.If proper irrigation is not maintained, excessive friction can occur between the inner blade and the outer hub therefore causing metal particulate shedding.However, given the information provided we cannot discern a definitive root cause for the reported failure.A device history record (dhr) review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.There was a process deviation that was unrelated to the reported problem. there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any subcomponents, which would contribute to this complaint condition.At this point, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary : the complaint device is not being returned,therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint cannot be confirmed.A device history record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident; therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the paperwork reviewed.No further information regarding the technique or instruments used has been provided to determine a root cause for this failure.If any additional information is obtained, this complaint will be re-opened to capture that information.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|