Model Number MODEL 3000 |
Device Problems
Computer Software Problem (1112); High impedance (1291); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/27/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Clinic notes were received which reported that this patient was referred to neurosurgery due to a recent interrogation showing high lead impedance.The notes indicate that the patient may need both a lead revision and battery generator replacement.Additional information was received that the patient underwent surgery where only the generator was replaced and it was stated to be a prophylactic replacement.The lead was not replaced at this time.High impedance was not observed after surgery, and diagnostics were within normal limits.The explant facility historically has reported that they cannot release explanted devices without the patient signing a release.No other relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
The explanted generator was received for product analysis.The generator underwent product analysis where it was found that the device performed according to functional specifications of the current automated final test.Analysis of the generator in the pa lab concluded that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Suspect device software version: version 1.5.2.1.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received that high impedance was observed on the programming tablet m3000 software v1.5 when the patient's output currents were set >0ma.When the patient's output currents were set to 0ma normal lead impedance was observed.It was determined that the cause of this false high impedance message was a software error on m3000 v1.5.2.1 software; when system diagnostics were performed by the user with m3000 v1.5.2.1 software on m102/102r generators (normal mode output current >0 ma), normal mode diagnostics would actually be performed instead.The execution of normal diagnostics instead of system diagnostics is not apparent to the user, and the returned dcdc code was being compared against system diagnostic thresholds.It was determined that m102/102r system diagnostics functioned as expected when the generator was programmed to 0 ma and provided a true impedance value.No further relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|