• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 100/111/035
Medical Device Problem Code Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 12/04/2018
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Information was received that a smiths medical endotracheal tube was found to be stuk and could not be removed.The cuff had to be cut from the et tube in order to fix the inline suction and ventilate this way.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: five portex endotracheal devices were returned for evaluation.Three of the samples were new and two were used.The returned devices were visually inspected.This inspection showed that one of the blue endotracheal tube connectors was damaged.The blue endotracheal tube connector is likely the component the reporter was referring to as the "blue cuff" that became "stuck".The remaining returned samples were given functional testing.The investigator attempted to separate the tube connector from the tube using hand force only.The tube connectors could be separated by hand force for all remaining samples.No sticking was observed.In addition, the device history record was reviewed for the reported lot number.The review showed no related observations identified to suggest the reported issue was observed during production.The manufacturing facility also performed a review of the manufacturing process.The review showed that assembly process was being performed as per procedures.The manufacturing facility also performed an in-process visual inspection of 32 products that were in the assembly area: this inspection showed no issues with the products being assembled.In effort to induce the condition seen on the used device that was returned, the investigator took a sample blue tube connector and pressed the connector against a sharp surface.The damage that occurred was physically similar to the damage seen on the returned sample.Following review of manufacturing procedures and investigation of the returned samples, the complaint allegation was confirmed.However, the investigation could not determine when the damage to the tube connector occurred.Two possible problem sources were noted as either of the following: the product become damaged after it left the facilities or a possible lack of detection by production personnel.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PORTEX® ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE
Common Device Name
TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis MN 55442
MDR Report Key8219773
Report Number3012307300-2019-00078
Device Sequence Number13502070
Product Code CBI
UDI-Device Identifier15019315018862
UDI-Public15019315018862
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source foreign,user facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/01/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device No Information
Device Catalogue Number100/111/035
Device Lot Number3631841
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/01/2019
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/05/2018
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/02/2019
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/04/2019
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/01/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-