|
Device evaluation: five portex endotracheal devices were returned for evaluation.Three of the samples were new and two were used.The returned devices were visually inspected.This inspection showed that one of the blue endotracheal tube connectors was damaged.The blue endotracheal tube connector is likely the component the reporter was referring to as the "blue cuff" that became "stuck".The remaining returned samples were given functional testing.The investigator attempted to separate the tube connector from the tube using hand force only.The tube connectors could be separated by hand force for all remaining samples.No sticking was observed.In addition, the device history record was reviewed for the reported lot number.The review showed no related observations identified to suggest the reported issue was observed during production.The manufacturing facility also performed a review of the manufacturing process.The review showed that assembly process was being performed as per procedures.The manufacturing facility also performed an in-process visual inspection of 32 products that were in the assembly area: this inspection showed no issues with the products being assembled.In effort to induce the condition seen on the used device that was returned, the investigator took a sample blue tube connector and pressed the connector against a sharp surface.The damage that occurred was physically similar to the damage seen on the returned sample.Following review of manufacturing procedures and investigation of the returned samples, the complaint allegation was confirmed.However, the investigation could not determine when the damage to the tube connector occurred.Two possible problem sources were noted as either of the following: the product become damaged after it left the facilities or a possible lack of detection by production personnel.
|