• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0315
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/26/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician found that the ruby coil would not deploy into the target vessel.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.No further details were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was slightly compressed at the proximal end of the pusher assembly but was intact.The pusher assembly had bends and kinks approximately 5.0 cm, 20.0 cm, 27.0 cm, 51.0 cm, 69.0 cm, 86.0 cm, 102.0 cm and 119.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was undamaged and intact with the pusher assembly distal detachment tip (ddt).Conclusion: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed the proximal pet lock was intact.If the pet lock is not broken, the pull wire could not retract allowing the embolization coil to detach.This may have occurred due to handle being improperly seated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.During functional testing, a demonstration handle was used and the proximal pet lock was separated and the pull wire was retracted from the ddt.However, the embolization coil did not detach due to dried blood on the proximal constraint sphere.If the pull wire was retracted from the ddt during the procedure, the embolization coil would have likely detached from the pusher assembly.Further evaluation revealed bends and kinks along the pusher assembly.These damages were likely incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Please note that the following sections are being updated based on additional information provided by the sales representative on 01/07/2019: describe event or problem.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2019-00033.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using ruby coils and a ruby coil detachment handle (handle).During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed several coils into the target vessel using the handle and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).The physician then reported difficulty detaching another ruby coil using the handle.The ruby coil was therefore removed.The procedure was completed using additional ruby coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key8220246
MDR Text Key132205813
Report Number3005168196-2019-00026
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018324
UDI-Public00814548018324
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,12/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0315
Device Lot NumberF83181
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/20/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/21/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-