|
This complaint reported while reaming the glenoid, the tab broke and part was left in the patient.The healthcare professional indicated there was a 10 minute delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The surgery was completed as intended.There was no risk or adverse event reported and the instrument was inspected prior to surgery and was found to be acceptable.Examination of the bone tap could not be performed as the instrument will not be returned.Part was left in the patient and the other part was discarded.Complaint database review showed previous complaints but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Summary of complaints: 3 functional, 16 dull/worn, 1 locking mechanism damaged, 5 seized/galled, 4 threads damaged/galled, 25 bent, 33 broke/cracked/damaged, 1 device cracked/broke, 5 end of life and 20 blank.The lot number is not a controlled number; therefore this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.The root cause for the initial problem cannot be determined with confidence as the instrument was not returned for investigational review.Surgical instruments condition can be determined while being used for its intended purpose.The replacement of surgical instruments due to normal wear and tear does not indicate a product deficiency, failure or issue.No further action is deemed necessary at this time.The reported condition could possibly be a result of heavy use/misuse/wear and care must be taken to avoid compromising their performance, refer to the instruction for use (ifu).There are no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency therefore no containment of inventory is required.Event is associated with instrument usage, not a design or manufacturing issue.
|