(b)(4).
During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.
The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.
It has not yet been received.
A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
It was reported that this was a percutaneous intervention, treating a de novo lesion within an arterial-venous shunt.
During use of the armada dilatation catheter, contrast was observed leaking from the base of the catheter shaft.
Another armada was used in replacement.
There were no adverse patient effects and there was no clinically significant delay.
No additional information was provided regarding this issue.
|