Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of (b)(6) (importer).Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).G1) name and address for importer site: (b)(6).Registration no.: (b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: the filter would not pass through the sheath.The procedure was completed with another device without any adverse effects to patient.The sheath and the femoral introducer with loaded filter were returned.Both were curved, probably to fit into a small plastic pouch for return.The filter was returned inside the protection tube, but after removing the tube some of the secondary filter legs were found not evenly distributed and one of them crossed its primary leg.However, the slightly misplaced secondary filter legs do not explain "the filter would not pass through the sheath", as removal of the filter from the sheath through the valve, would have caused severe damage to the secondary filter legs bending them upwards and not only a misplacement.During investigation the curved femoral introducer with the filter could be advanced through the curved sheath without any resistance and based on these findings the clinical setting that could impact on the functionality of the device cannot be replicated in the laboratory and consequently the exact reason for the reported difficulties encountered cannot be determined.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that it did not perform as intended.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|