| Model Number |
N/A |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
12/08/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during infusion of the anticancer agent, leakage occurred at the connection part of the infusion line and the port access needle.Although the infusion line was exchanged for a new one, leakage was not resolved.The physician replaced both the infusion line and the needle to new ones.Therefore, the infusion of anticancer agent could be completed without leaking.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during infusion of the anticancer agent, leakage occurred at the connection part of the infusion line and the port access needle.Although the infusion line was exchanged for a new one, leakage was not resolved.The physician replaced both the infusion line and the needle to new ones.Therefore, the infusion of anticancer agent could be completed without leaking.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a loose connection between iv pump and luer hub was confirmed and appears to be related to the use of the device.The product returned for evaluation was one 22 ga x 1 in winged infusion set w/y-site and an extension set attached to the y site hub.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through gradual deformation due to continuous outward-radiating stress within the luer hub orifice, also known as material creep.Likely sources of the stress include male luer adapters such as those found on some i.V.Administration sets and syringes.The returned product sample was evaluated and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: ¿ the luer hub orifice was found to be out of iso tolerance using a calibrated taper gauge ¿ usage residue was seen throughout the sample ¿ lack of mechanical damage on the luer hub ¿ a non-complainant male luer adapter device was returned which implied the use of this type of device ¿ attachment of the device to non-complainant luer-lock adapters was unremarkable the evidence suggests that a tapered object was forcefully inserted into the luer hub orifice then left in place, resulting in gradual widening, or creep, of the luer hub material.This type of failure was replicated at bas using 5 iso compliant slip-fit adapters and 5 non-complainant infusion sets.A combination of use of male luer adapters, the force with which those adapters were inserted, and the duration of insertion resulted in this type of slow luer hub deformation.Creep deformation takes place over days; however, the rate of deformation depends upon the force used to insert the taper.This type of damage may possibly be mitigated by reducing the insertion force and/or using luer-lock style adapters.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|