|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged catheter was confirmed, and the damage appeared to be associated with use of the device.The catheter was apparently damaged during the catheter trimming process.One 5 fr d/l powerpicc ft catheter was returned for investigation.The picc was received with the t-lock extension set attached to the red connector.The stylet had been completely removed from the picc and t-lock extension set.The catheter tubing was received in four segments.The section of tubing that contained the 37 through 40cm depth markers was not returned for investigation.The segment of tubing containing the 40 through 49 cm depth markers appeared to be partially fused together at the proximal end (40cm mark).The catheter material around one lumen appeared to be fused together from the cutting process.Four small holes were visible in the fused material, which caused four streams of water to exit in different directions from the fused end of the tubing during a functional test.Attempts to replicate the fusion of the catheter material by trimming the tubing with assorted scissors were unsuccessful.The damage could be associated with dull scissors or an instrument that uses heat to cut.To modify the catheter length, the product ifu states, ¿using a sterile scalpel or scissors, carefully cut the catheter according to institutional policy if necessary.¿ the ifu also states, ¿inspect cut surface to assure there is no loose material.¿ the implicated kit contained scissors and a scalpel.
|