The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: (b)(6) 2007: the patient underwent an open umbilical hernia repair in which a marlex mesh was implanted in the patient during the procedure.On (b)(6) 2017: the patient underwent an emergency laparotomy, the surgeon noted patient needed to have repair to the small bowel due to obstruction, repair to the mid-ileal due to perforation and peritonitis.Patient still experienced severe abdominal pain and distention.On (b)(6) 2018: the patient was seen by doctor who after examination and evaluation discussed with patient the need for a ventral incisional hernia repair with mesh excision and component separation.The mesh has to be removed.Patient continues to experience complications related to the marlex mesh and he most likely will require additional surgeries to repair the damage from the product.The marlex mesh implanted in patient failed to reasonably perform as intended.The product therefore had to be surgically removed, necessitating further invasive surgery to repair the very issue that the marlex mesh was intended to repair.The patient has been injured, sustained severe and permanent pain, suffering, anxiety, depression, disability, impairment.The patient has been injured and sustained past and future severe pain, suffering, disability, impairment.Due to the alleged defective marlex mesh.
|