According to the reporter, during laparoscopic hernia repair, while the device was being applied in stapling the hernia, the device would not fire.They used another device to resolve the issue in order to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
|
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of one device.Visual inspection of the instrument noted the handle was partially retracted.No damage was noted to the e piece.Functionally, the device was able to rotate properly.During firing, the tacks seated properly, but handle did not retract after firing.The leaf spring was loose on handle.The unit was opened as instructed by engineering and it was noted the leaf spring was detached and rolled.Additionally, the spring retainer was broken.A review of the device history record could not be performed because the lot number was not provided.However, records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.Root cause of the reported condition is due to an excessive amount of adhesive being applied to the spring retainer during the assembly process.The additional adhesive prevented the spring retainer from properly functioning and resulted in it breaking.A broken spring retainer will prevent the return of the handle after actuating, thus preventing the unit from firing.The product analysis established a relationship between a device failure and the reported incident of instrument did not fire.The root cause of the observed condition was determined to be a result of a manufacturing activity and a process improvement has been initiated to prevent this condition from recurring.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|