| Catalog Number |
641CF0615 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Stretched (1601); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
12/23/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, ethnicity, and medical history were not provided.Procode is krd/hcg.Physical manufacturer name: codman and shurtleff inc., dba depuy synthes products, inc.((b)(4)).(b)(6).The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during the coil embolization procedure of the right posterior cerebral artery (pca) aneurysm, the physician attempted to push the 6mm x 15cm g2 tdl complex fill coil (641cf0615 / s13661) through the prowler select lpes microcatheter (30023533 / unknown lot#) when the coil was met with resistance and became bent distally.It was confirmed that the guidewire did not experience any resistance, there was no kink or damage on the microcatheter, the microcatheter did not have any obstruction, and continuous flush was maintained through the microcatheter.The physician replaced the g2 coil and completed the procedure with the replacement coil.There was no procedural delay from the reported issue.There was no report of any patient consequence or adverse event.The product was reported as available to be returned for evaluation and testing.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to document the result of the analysis of the production records for lot s13661.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot s13661 presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during the coil embolization procedure of the right posterior cerebral artery (pca) aneurysm, the physician attempted to push the 6mm x 15cm g2 tdl complex fill coil (b)(4) through the prowler select lpes microcatheter ((b)(4) / unknown lot#) when the coil was met with resistance and became bent distally.It was confirmed that the guidewire did not experience any resistance, there was no kink or damage on the microcatheter, the microcatheter did not have any obstruction, and continuous flush was maintained through the microcatheter.The physician replaced the g2 coil and completed the procedure with the replacement coil.There was no procedural delay from the reported issue.There was no report of any patient consequence or adverse event.The product was returned for evaluation and analysis.The investigational finding is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 6mm x 15cm g2 tdl complex fill coil was received contained in a pouch.The returned device underwent visual inspection.The hub was observed without any damage.The device positioning unit (dpu) and the resheathing tool were also observed to be in normal, good conditions.The coil introducer was unzipped and elongated / broken.The embolic coil was received inside the introducer.Microscopic inspection was performed.The v-notch was in good condition.The resistance heating (rh) was not heated, the rh and articulation joint were both in good conditions.The embolic coil was observed to be in stretched condition.Functional testing for the issue related to the reported resistance/friction during advancement issue could not be conducted due to the condition of the coil introducer.The reported issue related to the resistance/friction during advancement was not confirmed through analysis as the device could not undergo functional testing.The reported issue that the coil became bent distally due to the resistance it encountered during the advancement was not confirmed; however, the coil was observed to be in stretched condition, which could be related to the resistance/friction issue it encountered during advancement.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot s13661 presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Coil stretching is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instruction for use (ifu) provides proper handling instructions for the device to prevent such issue from occurring.The exact cause of the stretched condition of the embolic coil could not be determined, but the condition of the coil introducer being elongated / broken may have contributed to the coil becoming stretched.It is also possible that circumstances of the procedure and/or device manipulation/interaction may have contributed to the coil stretching.Based on the device history record review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.In addition, devices undergo 100% inspection at final assembly for the condition of the embolic coil.Thus, it is not likely that the 6mm x 15cm g2 tdl complex fill coil left the manufacturing facility with the embolic coil in a stretched condition.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event of failure to detach was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.(b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product was received by the product analysis lab on (b)(6) /2019.The return product is pending evaluation.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|