• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/26/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Tha.Event description: dr.(b)(6) has been stating that some of her cups look more vertical than what was planned them during her tha procedures.I am going to upload two different hip cases in the shared folder named "mclaren flint tha cases" so that you can review the cup placement.One of these cases was done by me and the other was done by a senior mps on my team.We would love any feedback regarding the placement of her cups.Please let me know if i uploaded the case files correctly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up #1 and final report submitted.Reported event: an event regarding incorrect landmark selected involving 3.0 rio robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.Complaint history: a search of the complaint database under device identification pn: 209999 reports similar complaints for tha software - incorrect landmark selected.The complaint record numbers are: (b)(4).Conclusion: a review of the session data for this plan shows there was a large discrepancy between where patient landmarks were selected and where ct landmarks were selected.This error would cause a rotation to occur during registration affecting accuracy.The only version and inclination value available were the ones provided during impaction surgical results page was not executed.Without the version and inclination value from this page its not possible to confirm whether there was error in the version and inclination of the cup.The mismatch between ct landmarks and patient landmarks could have caused the issue reported by the surgeon.Per the data in the logs the system appears to have behaved as expected and accuracy of registration and landmark selection is the cause of error.Note: both plans provided by mps showed discrepancies between the ct and patient landmarks primarily the superior and anterior landmarks.
 
Event Description
Tha.Event description: dr.(b)(6) has been stating that some of her cups look more vertical than what was planned them during her tha procedures.I am going to upload two different hip cases in the shared folder named "(b)(6) tha cases" so that you can review the cup placement.One of these cases was done by me and the other was done by a senior mps on my team.We would love any feedback regarding the placement of her cups.Please let me know if i uploaded the case files correctly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8263512
MDR Text Key133856981
Report Number3005985723-2019-00068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/21/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/27/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-