|
If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.Udi: (b)(4).The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation confirms the anchor is broken in half between the cortical and spongeous threads.The anchor is still mounted on the driver.There is no other damage to the anchor and the suture bridge is intact.A batch review was conducted during investigation of one other similar complaint in the same lot.No special events were identified that could have contributed to this failure.Anchor breakages are typically associated with off axis insertion, levering during insertion, hard bone quality or using incorrect instrumentation for preparing bone hole.A dhr review was conducted and the results indicate that this batch was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.One other complaint was observed from this lot released to distribution.It was reported that the insertion was not off axis, correct instrumentation was used for prepping bone hole and the patient had a normal bone quality.Although the complaint can be confirmed, a root cause for the user to have experienced this issue cannot be determined.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.A non-conformance search was performed for this product code 222344, lot 3896902 combination and no non-conformances were identified.No further information regarding the technique or instruments used has been provided to determine a root cause for this failure.If any additional information is obtained, this complaint will be re-opened to capture that information.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.This report is being filed from the etq complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgical procedure, it was observed that the healix peek 3.4mm anchor device broke in the hole in the same axis upon insertion and after one round of awling.According to the reporter, the awl/tap was used to the proper depth prior to the anchor being inserted.The same bone hole was used for the 2nd anchor.The procedure was extended three minutes due to the complaint device breaking.The anchor broke between cortical and spongious.The patient had average bone quality.The entire complaint device was removed from the patient.There were no adverse patient consequences.There was patient involvement reported.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|