It was reported that a baby girl/¿patient¿ was born via ¿normal birth¿ and the doctor used the device before the delivery time for monitoring of the fetal heart.Philips was advised that during the birth, the doctor had trouble connecting the device to the infant's head and after repeated attempts, the device had been replaced.At birth, the hospital reportedly saw swelling and redness that they assumed was caused by the repeated attempts to connect the device.Two weeks later, the patient appeared at the emergency room and a metallic foreign body attached to the scalp was noticed.The object was removed by surgery and the patient was hospitalized for one day for observation philips inquired if the difficulty in connecting the device could have resulted in the electrode being over rotated, leading to breakage of the device¿s tip.The distributor responded that the doctor was unaware that the electrode broke, so he likely would not know how it broke.A return material authorization was issued for return of the device involved in the incident for evaluation.However, philips was advised that the hospital team was not aware of the occurrence of the broken electrode.Therefore, the device was not retained.Philips was also informed that the hospital does not have information about the device, batch or any other detail.Further information was requested related to this information, but an answer could not be provided.Philips is considering this a malfunction of cause unknown for reporting purposes only.
|