|
If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.(b)(4).The complaint device is not available for a physical evaluation.No further information regarding the technique or instruments used has been provided to determine a root cause for this failure.A dhr review has been conducted and the results indicate that this batch of product was processed without any incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, should any new information be provided in future, this file will be reopened and a thorough investigation will be performed.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.This report is being filed from the (b)(4) as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep that the surgeon launched two sutures¿ and two permatape on the customer's 4.5mm healix advance knotless peek anchor causing the tip to break during a rotator cuff repair surgical procedure.There was no debris in patient as the device was not implanted nor used.The case was completed with another like device.There were no adverse patient consequences or delay.The rep stated the device was discarded by the customer.There was patient involvement reported.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|