• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; CONDYLAR PLATE FIXATION IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; CONDYLAR PLATE FIXATION IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Arthritis (1723); Discomfort (2330); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
Event Date 03/20/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown plates: 3.5 mm lcp clavicle hook plate /unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Investigation summary - product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: erdle, b.Et al (2017), comparative analysis of locking plate versus hook plate osteosynthesis of neer type iib lateral clavicle fractures, archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, vol.137(5), pages 651-662 (germany).This retrospective, comparative cohort study aims to analyze and compare radiological results, functional outcomes and complications of locking plate osteosynthesis (lpo) versus hook plate osteosynthesis (hpo).For the last 12 years, a total of 32 patients (28 male and 4 female) underwent operative treatment for acute lateral clavicle fractures.Of these patients, 19 patients with a mean age 44.3±14.9 years were treated with 3.5 mm lcp clavicular hook plate (depuy synthes, west chester, usa) while 13 patients with a mean age of 43.7±13.7 were treated with 3.5 mm locking compression t-plate (depuy synthes) respectively for (7) patients and 2.7/3.5 mm locking compression superior lateral clavicle plate respectively for (6) patients.Standardized radiographs were routinely performed postoperatively, after 3, 4.5, 6, 12 months and then annually as needed.Mean follow-up period was 54.2 months (range, 25.2 ¿ 111.4 months.The following complications were reported as follow under hpo: a (b)(6) years-old at follow-up obtained a satisfactory outcome.This patient showed a symptomatic subacromial impingement syndrome with a mildly positive starter test.1 patient with a fair result suffered from symptomatic non-union of the lateral clavicle following hook plate osteosynthesis.2 patients had delayed union.1 patient had peri-implant fracture 6 weeks after surgery at routine follow-up examination without any history of trauma.5 patients had acromial osteolysis at follow-up.8 patients had posttraumatic acj arthrosis.Of these patients 1 showed mild clinical symptoms and did not require secondary surgery.The following complications were reported as follow under lpo: the article did not specify which of the 3.5 mm lcp t-plate or 2.7/3.5 mm lcp superior lateral clavicle plate had caused the complications.3 cases of lpo implants were removed after a mean time-period of 12.5 months on explicit patients request due to a subjective sense of local irritation.3 patients had delayed union.1 patient had posttraumatic acj arthrosis.This report is for an unknown synthes 3.5 mm lcp clavicular hook plate, unknown synthes 3.5 mm locking compression t-plate and unknown synthes 2.7/3.5 mm locking compression superior lateral clavicle plate.This is report 4 of 4 for (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
CONDYLAR PLATE FIXATION IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ   4436
6103142063
MDR Report Key8278495
MDR Text Key134194168
Report Number8030965-2019-60364
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/07/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/25/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/07/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-