|
Catalog Number 466FXXXX |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Embolus (1830); Occlusion (1984); Thrombosis (2100)
|
Event Date 05/08/2007 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.Date of event: please note that the exact event date is unknown and the event date is the complaint awareness date.As reported, the patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to post-implant deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.The devices were not returned for analysis.A device history record (dhr) review could not be conducted as the sterile lot number was not provided.The inferior vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Blood clots that develop in the veins of the leg or pelvis, may be related to a condition called deep vein thrombosis (dvt).Deep vein thrombosis (dvt) occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein and is most common in the deep veins of the lower leg (calf) and can spread up to the veins in the thigh.Placement of a vena cava filter is not a cure for dvt nor does it prevent the formation of dvt or other clots (thrombosis).Large thrombus within the vena cava or lower extremities may impede perfusion and cause venous insufficiency.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological, lesion characteristics or other comorbidities.The presence of these clots do not represent a device malfunction.There is no medical evidence of a causal relationship between the vena cava filter and the formation of new dvt and thrombosis.Recurrent pulmonary embolism is a known potential complication of filter implantation and is listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as such.There are possible patient and pharmacological factors that may have contributed to the reported event.Based on the minimal information provided, it is not possible to draw a clinical conclusion or determine a root cause for the reported events.Based on the minimal information provided, it is not possible to draw a clinical conclusion or determine a root cause for the reported event.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design, manufacturing process or implantation of the device; therefore no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to post-implant deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the patient has a history of pulmonary hypertension.The filter was deployed via the patient's right femoral vein.Additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced post-implant pulmonary emboli, blood clots, clotting, and/or occlusion of the inferior vena cava, recurrent deep venous thrombosis, shortness of breath, left leg pain, constant worry and anxiety.The patient became aware of the reported events approximately seven months after the index procedure.As reported, the patient had placement of an optease inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.Per the medical records, the patient has a history of pulmonary hypertension.The filter was deployed via the patient's right femoral vein.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to post-implant deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Per the patient profile form (ppf), the patient reports post-implant pulmonary emboli, blood clots, clotting, and/or occlusion of the inferior vena cava, recurrent deep venous thrombosis, shortness of breath, left leg pain, constant worry and anxiety.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Post procedure pulmonary embolism is a known potential adverse event associated with the use of the ivc filters.These events may be related to excessive clot burden from underlying patient specific factors.Blood clots, dvt and occlusive thrombosis within the filter and vasculature do not represent a device malfunction.Anxiety, shortness of breath and pain do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient related issues.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|