• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ITREVIA 5 HF-T QP DF4 IS4 PROMRI; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG ITREVIA 5 HF-T QP DF4 IS4 PROMRI; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 402657
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
Patient Problem Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
Event Date 11/18/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Ous mdr - device explanted due to noise events sensed on rv lead as ventricular arrhythmias.As a result, the patient received multiple shocks.No adverse events were monitored during last followup with no prior recordings.Due to inappropriate therapy, the crt-d battery decreased significantly to 36% and during the lead extraction procedure the device was replaced as well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lead and the icd under complaint were returned and thoroughly analyzed.Upon receipt, the icd was interrogated, revealing the battery status mos2.The icd was implanted for 22 months and 116 charging cycles were recorded to the icds memory.The memory content of the device was analyzed.During the analysis of the available iegms noise was observed in the right ventricular channel.Therefore a sensing test was performed, and the device sensed the attached heart signals free of noise, proving the sensing function of the icd to be fully functional.There was no indication of a device malfunction.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached.Subsequently the lead was visually inspected showing multiple signs of wear along the lead body.In particular between 55.5 cm and 57 cm distal to the is-1 connector pin the insulation was found rubbed through.This damage can be considered as the root cause of the reported noise in the right ventricular channel.The manufacturing process for these devices was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the icd functions to be as specified.In conclusion, the memory content as well as the therapeutic functionality of the icd were inspected.In the available iegms the occurrence of noise was observed in the right ventricular channel.However, a thorough analysis of the icd proved the device to be fully functional.The clinical observation resulted presumably from the leads insulation damage.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The correct analysis results are now attached.The lead and the icd under complaint were returned and thoroughly analyzed.Upon receipt, the icd was interrogated, revealing the battery status mos2.The icd was implanted for 22 months and 116 charging cycles were recorded to the icds memory.The memory content of the device was analyzed.During the analysis of the available iegms noise was observed in the right ventricular channel.Therefore a sensing test was performed, and the device sensed the attached heart signals free of noise, proving the sensing function of the icd to be fully functional.There was no indication of a device malfunction.The ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached.Subsequently the lead was visually inspected showing multiple signs of wear along the lead body.In particular between 55.5 cm and 57 cm distal to the is-1 connector pin the insulation was found rubbed through.This damage can be considered as the root cause of the reported noise in the right ventricular channel.The manufacturing process for these devices was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.Particularly the final acceptance test proved the icd functions to be as specified.In conclusion, the memory content as well as the therapeutic functionality of the icd were inspected.In the available iegms the occurrence of noise was observed in the right ventricular channel.However, a thorough analysis of the icd proved the device to be fully functional.The clinical observation resulted presumably from the leads insulation damage.
 
Event Description
Ous mdr - device explanted due to noise events sensed on rv lead as ventricular arrhythmias.As a result, the patient received multiple shocks.No adverse events were monitored during last followup with no prior recordings.Due to inappropriate therapy, the crt-d battery decreased significantly to 36 percent and during the lead extraction procedure the device was replaced as well.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ITREVIA 5 HF-T QP DF4 IS4 PROMRI
Type of Device
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
MDR Report Key8292670
MDR Text Key134591282
Report Number1028232-2019-00300
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2018
Device Model Number402657
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/03/2019
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/13/2018
Initial Date FDA Received01/31/2019
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/01/2019
04/01/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/30/2019
09/14/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-