• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO RESTORE SENSOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO RESTORE SENSOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 37714
Device Problems Ambient Noise Problem (2877); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/01/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for spinal cord stimulation - spinal pain.It was reported that the patient charged to full and the charge lasted only 2 days.Patient stated she used to be able to go a week between charges.No falls/trauma related.Patient stated she had a sonogram around her liver and her ins was on her right side and the sonogram was also on the right side.Patient stated this issue started 2-3 weeks ago and her sonogram was in november/december 2018.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the rep.It was reported that the cause was not determined.The plan was to have patient log her charging intervals over 2 weeks and call to update.Additional information was received on (b)(6) from the rep who reported they spoke with the patient who reported she had great past week of charging her battery to full and noticed charge interval was better.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic, inc.(medtronic) is submitting this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information in the time allotted and has provided as much information as is available to the company as of the submission date this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any "defects" or has "malfunctioned".These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda, to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of reporting pursuant to part 803.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like it because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient and a manufacturer representative (rep).It was reported that the patient was charging the ins every 2 days and they were previously charging every 7 days.The rep stated that the patient said the ins was not holding a charge.The rep said that average coupling was 6 and the duration was 1.8.The rep read the following recharging statistics: (b)(6) 2019 1.8 75%, (b)(6) 1.3 50%, (b)(6) 1.6 25%, (b)(6) 1.8 50%, (b)(6) 2 50%.Technical services reviewed that the patient was not charging the ins to full.It was recommended to have the patient charge to full and work on getting 8 boxes, then see how long a charge lasts.No symptoms were reported.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESTORE SENSOR
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
MDR Report Key8297542
MDR Text Key134760982
Report Number3004209178-2019-02248
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994610430
UDI-Public00613994610430
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/27/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/01/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2013
Device Model Number37714
Device Catalogue Number37714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
-
-