• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH PFNA-II BLADE L90 TAN; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH PFNA-II BLADE L90 TAN; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.027.053S
Device Problem Device Difficult to Maintain (3134)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 01/17/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.510k device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.A review of the device history records has been requested.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the patient underwent a proximal femur nailing procedure using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (pfna-ii) for a trochanteric fracture on (b)(6) 2019.During surgery, the pfna-ii blade did not work properly and failed interlocking options.There was a surgical delay of 45 minutes.The procedure was completed successfully using a different pfna-ii implant.Patient outcome is unknown.Concomitant device: unknown pfna-ii nail (part# unknown, lot# unknown, quantity# 1).This complaint involves one (1) device.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Visual inspection: upon visual inspection of the complaint device it can be seen that we have received the article in a slightly open condition.Furthermore, the received device shows dents and scratches all over the surface of the part.Functional test: during investigation a functional test was performed, the blade passed the functional test.In addition, in fully open condition the part shows some post-manufacturing damage, based on this damage the function is a bit sluggish dimensional inspection: as the blade is fully functional, the complaint is unconfirmed and no further investigation will be done, as material and dimension evaluation.Furthermore, the reported device was assembled according to drawing, and all parts went through a functional test, before they had left the production.Summary: there is no particularize information what's happened to this article by customer, unfortunately we are not able to determine the exact reason for this occurrence, but we have to assume that during the operation an application error may have taken place.No product fault could be detected.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device history lot part: 04.027.053s lot: l708136 manuf.Site: bettlach release to warehouse: 03.January 2018 expiry date: 01.December 2027 a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot 708136, and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PFNA-II BLADE L90 TAN
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
MDR Report Key8302532
MDR Text Key134969577
Report Number8030965-2019-60612
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KTT
UDI-Device Identifier07611819394223
UDI-Public(01)07611819394223
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/20/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/04/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.027.053S
Device Lot NumberL708136
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/04/2019
Date Manufacturer Received02/20/2019
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-