| Model Number |
241.381 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient identifier: (b)(6).Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent explantation of a locking compression plate (lcp) one-third tubular plate on (b)(6) 2019 due to broken plate.Initially the patient had elbow surgery on (b)(6) 2018 and was implanted with locking compression plate (lcp) one-third tubular plate.Procedure outcome and patient status is unknown.This report is for one (1) lcp one-third tubular plate with collar 8 holes.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Patient number # (b)(6).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent explantation of a locking compression plate (lcp) one-third tubular plate due to broken hardware.The patient felt pain when she moved her arm.The original date of implant was previously done on (b)(6) 2018.It is unknown if there was surgical delay.Procedure outcome and patient status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.A: patient height reported as 160.02cm.A1 b5, b6.B7 g2 h6: codes updated to imdrf.H6: code e2402 used to capture required revision surgery.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was further reported that on (b)(6), 2018, patient felt a snap in her forearm.Patient had found out to have broken plate at the empty screw area of the fracture.On (b)(6), 2019, patient underwent left ulnar fracture delayed union and removal of broken hardware and revision of open reduction internal fixation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.Visual inspection: the lcp one-third tubular pl collar 8 h/93 (part #: 241.381, lot #: h610366) was received at us cq.Upon visual inspection, the plate was broken at the fifth (5th) hole from the end that was laser etched.Minor surface scratches related eventually to implantation and explantation were also observed.Dimensional inspection: measurement was taken on each side of the breakage per relevant drawing.Measured dimensions: plate thickness = conforming plate thickness = conforming plate width = conforming plate width = conforming document/specification review: relevant drawing was reviewed.No design issues or discrepancies were identified.Investigation conclusion: this complaint is confirmed as the complaint device was received broken.Although no definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information, it is likely the device experienced high stress post operation.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventive action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.H3, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part # 241.381 synthes lot # h610366 supplier lot # n/a release to warehouse date: 30 apr 2013 manufacturing location: elmira no ncr's were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H4.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|