COOK ENDOSCOPY FUSION® PRE-LOADED WITH ACROBAT WIRE GUIDE; KNS, UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number FS-OMNI-ACRO-35-205 |
Device Problem
Failure to Align (2522)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 01/15/2019 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation evaluation: six boxes were returned from the lot number said to be involved.The first box had been opened and the complaint device was not included in the return.The five other boxes returned contained sealed product from the complaint lot number.An evaluation of the five sealed devices was performed.Device 1: an evaluation of the returned device could not confirm the report of incorrect cutting wire orientation.During our laboratory analysis, the sphincterotome was advanced through a duodenoscope that was placed in a simulated biliary position.The duodenoscope has an accessory channel that is 4.2 mm in diameter (olympus model number tjf-160v).The catheter exited the endoscope with the cutting wire facing 11 o¿clock.The device was then bowed and the cutting wire was facing 12 o'clock (appropriate orientation is approximately 11:00 - 1:00 o'clock).The sphincterotome catheter was subjected to a close visual examination and twisting of the tubing was not observed at the distal end.No kinks were observed in the catheter tubing.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported event was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Device 2: an evaluation of the returned device could not confirm the report of incorrect cutting wire orientation.During our laboratory analysis, the sphincterotome was advanced through a duodenoscope that was placed in a simulated biliary position.The duodenoscope has an accessory channel that is 4.2 mm in diameter (olympus model number tjf-160v).The catheter exited the endoscope with the cutting wire facing 11 o¿clock.The device was then bowed and the cutting wire was facing 11 o'clock (appropriate orientation is approximately 11:00 - 1:00 o'clock).The sphincterotome catheter was subjected to a close visual examination and twisting of the tubing was not observed at the distal end.No kinks were observed in the catheter tubing.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported event was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Device 3: an evaluation of the returned device could not confirm the report of incorrect cutting wire orientation.During our laboratory analysis, the sphincterotome was advanced through a duodenoscope that was placed in a simulated biliary position.The duodenoscope has an accessory channel that is 4.2 mm in diameter (olympus model number tjf-160v).The catheter exited the endoscope with the cutting wire facing 11 o¿clock.The device was then bowed and the cutting wire was facing 12 o'clock (appropriate orientation is approximately 11:00 - 1:00 o'clock).The sphincterotome catheter was subjected to a close visual examination and twisting of the tubing was not observed at the distal end.No kinks were observed in the catheter tubing.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported event was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Device 4: an evaluation of the returned device could not confirm the report of incorrect cutting wire orientation.During our laboratory analysis, the sphincterotome was advanced through a duodenoscope that was placed in a simulated biliary position.The duodenoscope has an accessory channel that is 4.2 mm in diameter (olympus model number tjf-160v).The catheter exited the endoscope with the cutting wire facing 12 o¿clock.The device was then bowed and the cutting wire was facing 12 o'clock (appropriate orientation is approximately 11:00 - 1:00 o'clock).The sphincterotome catheter was subjected to a close visual examination and twisting of the tubing was not observed at the distal end.No kinks were observed in the catheter tubing.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported event was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Device 5: an evaluation of the returned device could not confirm the report of incorrect cutting wire orientation.During our laboratory analysis, the sphincterotome was advanced through a duodenoscope that was placed in a simulated biliary position.The duodenoscope has an accessory channel that is 4.2 mm in diameter (olympus model number tjf-160v).The catheter exited the endoscope with the cutting wire facing 12 o¿clock.The device was then bowed and the cutting wire was facing 12 o'clock (appropriate orientation is approximately 11:00 - 1:00 o'clock).The sphincterotome catheter was subjected to a close visual examination and twisting of the tubing was not observed at the distal end.No kinks were observed in the catheter tubing.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported event was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined because the returned sealed functioned as intended and the prior to use product was not returned.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Prior to distribution, all fusion pre-loaded with acrobat wire guide sphincterotomes are subjected to a visual inspection and functional test to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy, the physician used three (3) cook fusion pre-loaded with acrobat wire guide sphincterotomes.The doctor tried to use the sphincterotomes, but the tip of the instrument went in the wrong direction; it was not possible to cannulate the bile duct (see related mdr 1037905-2019-00054).The customer took a cook fusion omni ercp catheter and then a cook fusion triple lumen sphincterotome, and it worked.The customer also reported incorrect orientation prior to use regarding the same device from a different lot (subject of this report).This occurred prior to patient contact; there was no impact to the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|