|
Investigation results were made available.Additional: b3, h2, h6.Correction: b4, b5, g4, g7, h10.Dhr review: ref: 00-8775-028-01 ; lot: 2886326.Yield: 100.Delivered: 100.The device manufacturing quality records indicate that the released components met all requirements to perform as intended.Trend analysis: no trigger considering the following event is identified: pain/abductor tear event description: it was reported that patient was implanted with biolox head on left hip side and it was reported that after a slip/fall injury, the patient suffered chronic tear of abductors of left hip, thus trendelenburg gait: (abnormal gait, as with walking, caused by weakness of the abductor muscles of the lower limb.) there is no information that suggests that the device caused or contributed to the patient's injury.The patient is applying voltaren gel prn to relieve from pain.Review of received data: review of operative note dated (b)(6) 2017 confirmed that the patient underwent an initial left total hip arthroplasty.It was stated that, due to the patient's morbid obesity (bmi 35.7) the procedure was more complex and took 50% longer.Sequential reaming of the acetabulum was performed and the shell was implanted with maximum rigid press-fit and stability noted.The liner was impacted.The femur was sequentially rasped until stability was identified.Trial reductions were performed and optimized motion, stability, and restoration of leg lengths was observed.The final implants were implanted and the hip reduced.No complications were noted.Review of post operative exam dated (b)(6) 2017 identified that the patient returned for a follow up visit of the left total hip arthroplasty with a pain level of 2/10.No complications or abnormalities were noted upon exam of the patient.Review of the x-rays dated (b)(6) 2017 identified anatomic alignment of the left hip components.No osseous abnormalities or abnormal radiolucencies were observed.No evidence of malfunction was observed with any implant in the left hip and acetabular inclination angle appeared normal.No abnormalities regarding the ceramic head is noticed.Devices analysis: no devices analysis possible, as products are still implanted.Review of product documentation: this device is intended for treatment.The compatibility check was performed and showed that the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Conclusion summary: the quality records show that all specified characteristics (material, dimensions, surface, etc.) have met the specifications valid at the time of production.The investigation results did not identify a non-conformance or a complaint out of box (coob).Potential reason of the pain is the fall that patient had experienced.However, with the information available at the hand it is not possible to find the root cause of the reported event.There is no information that suggests that the device caused or contributed to the patient's injury.Based on the given information the complaint could not be confirmed.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|