| Model Number |
20-0950 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Malposition of Device (2616)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiac Arrest (1762); Pneumothorax (2012)
|
| Date of Event |
01/18/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a nurse, accompanied by a student nurse, attempted to re-insert the guidewire into the cortrack feeding tube that was already placed in the patient.The patient was in the stroke ward for confusion and dysarthria.On the cortrack machine, the monitor showed that the guidewire was going into the right lung.The nurse pushed and pulled on the guidewire, and attempted to re-insert it four times.These actions pushed the guidewire deeper into the lung.During the attempts to re-insert the guidewire, the patient arrested.The patient was taken to (b)(6) and had a right chest drain inserted.The patient returned to the stroke ward on (b)(6) 2019 and is well and doing fine.No further information provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: mfr narrative was left off the initial report in error.The actual complaint product was not returned for evaluation.Root cause could not be determined.The device history record for lot 1211007 was reviewed and the product was produced according to product specifications.All information reasonably known as of 27 feb 2019 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by avanos medical inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to avanos medical inc.Avanos medical inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the halyard health complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an avanos medical inc.Product is defective or caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the report has been returned and is being processed for evaluation.All information reasonably known as of 06 mar 2019 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by avanos medical inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to avanos medical inc.Avanos medical inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the halyard health complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an avanos medical inc.Product is defective or caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
One cortrak unit was returned for evaluation.The device was inspected and no damage, breaks, or cracks were found.Functional testing of the device indicated that the unit worked as intended.Files of tracings from the reported event date were reviewed.The review of the tracings indicated that multiple views were aborted during the procedure.It is difficult to identify which tracing caused the incident since none of the tracings started in the correct location.All information reasonably known as of 02 apr 2019 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by avanos medical inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to avanos medical inc.Avanos medical inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the halyard health complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an avanos medical inc.Product is defective or caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: per information received on 4 apr 2019, the device that was returned by the customer was confirmed to be a different unit than the one involved in the reported incident.All information reasonably known as of 24 apr 2019 has been included in this health authority report.Should additional information be obtained, a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by avanos medical inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to avanos medical inc.Avanos medical inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the halyard health complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that an avanos medical inc.Product is defective or caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per additional information received 4 apr 2019, the patient's cardiac arrest was not caused by the lung placement.The rep determined that the nurse who was re-inserting the guidewire was not using it correctly, and therefore the rep gave the nurse full cortrak training, to prevent recurrence of the issue.The timeline of events that occurred are as follows: on (b)(6) 2019, nurse b inserted the patient's first nasogastric (ng) tube using the cortrak device.Four attempts were made to place this tube, and placement was confirmed as correct via x-ray.In the evening, the patient pulled out the ng tube, and was not fed overnight.On (b)(6) 2019, nurse c inserted another ng tube but was unable to get aspirate.This tube was not placed using the cortrak device, as it was a corflo ng tube (non-cortrak).The documentation for this new tube was not put in the correct place and was therefore not seen by all staff, leading some to be under the impression that this corflo tube was the original cotrack tube placed on (b)(6) 2019.Nurse d and nurse a did additional ph tests on aspirate to confirm placement of the ng tube, but the results were too high and were therefore not used.Nurse a, who allegedly was aware that this was the second, non-cotrak tube that was placed, decided to use the cortrak machine and reinserting the guidewire to confirm placement.Four insertion attempts were made, and the patient began to deteriorate, and a doctor was called as the patient was going into cardiac arrest.The hospital confirms that nurse a is currently not authorized to place any ng tubes or use the cortrak machine while the hospital investigates the incident.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|