|
A review of the device history records has been requested.The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device performed at customer quality (cq) confirmed the condition of breakage, which agrees with the reported complaint condition.The device was received in two (2) pieces.The 2.0mm drill guide component tube has broken off the handle component at the soldered feature.Document/specification review: no product design issues or discrepancies were observed during this investigation.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection is not possible for the failed solder feature.Material analysis: the design specified the 2.0mm drill guide component to be secured to the handle component with silver solder material.A material confirmation for the silver solder from the time of manufacture was not able to reviewed because only top level of the device history record reviewed as sub-components are not lot tracked.Investigation conclusion: a definitive assignable root cause for the drill guide soldered feature failing could not be determined based on the provided information.It is possible that excessive downward force was used to securely seat the toothed tip in bone leading to the solder joint failing.This complaint is confirmed however no product design issues or manufacturing discrepancies that would contribute to the reported complaint condition were identified during this investigation.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device history lot: part: 312.240, lot: 7992256, manufacturing site: bettlach, release to warehouse date: 27.Aug.2012.The device history record shows this lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and functional criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Only top level of the device history record reviewed as sub-components are not lot tracked.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|